Skin cancer is one of the most common skin diseases with a high prevalence across the globe. According to the World Health Organization, skin cancer affects three million people worldwide each year and is growing at an alarming rate. Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies, an expanding disease, and painful in appearance. This disease imposes substantial emotional and financial costs on the affected people. Each type of skin cell is responsible for the development of different skin cancers. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma are derived from basal cells, squamous cells, and melanocytes, respectively. [1, 2]. Previous studies have demonstrated that BCC is one of the most common types of cancer in Iran [1].
The most common types of skin cancer are non-melanoma malignancies, affecting between two and three million people per year. Nonetheless, this is a rough estimate since sufficient statistics are not available. About 80% of non-melanoma skin cancers are BCC, and the remaining 20% are SCC. BCC and SCC are rarely fatal. In the United States, less than 0.1% of cancer deaths are due to this particular type of cancer. Melanoma was diagnosed in 232,000 people in 2012, resulting in 55,000 deaths Worldwide. The highest rate of melanoma in the world is observed in Australia and New Zealand [3, 4].
According to studies conducted in Iran, the incidence rate of this cancer is about 16.51 new cases per 100 people. It is the most widespread cancer among men and the second most prevalent malignancy among women [3]. BCC arises from basal cells of the lower epidermis and mainly develops on sun-exposed areas of the skin. Various factors, such as genetics, immunodeficiency, light skin, and chronic exposure to sunlight, are involved in the pathogenesis. Since metastasis is rare in BCC lesions, the mortality rate of this malignancy is very low; nonetheless, local spread and malformation can be observed in this disease [5, 6].
A wide array of factors is involved in the development of cancer, including viruses and bacteria, as well as chemical, physical, genetic, and family factors [7]. According to studies conducted in the Netherlands and England, the causes of skin cancer can be increased outdoor activities without adequate clothing, increased travel to the beach, prolonged exposure to sunlight, and ozone depletion [8]. One of the critical risk factors associated with the development of skin cancer is sunlight and ultraviolet rays [9]. We should expect a high prevalence of skin cancers in Iran due to intense sunlight in most seasons and the frequent contact of farmers, ranchers, sailors, and construction workers with sun rays [10]
Cancer epidemiology examines gender, age, social, economic, and occupational differences in people with cancer in the geographical regions of the same country and different countries [11]. Such descriptive studies are of great help in understanding the causes of various cancers. Considering the aforementioned issues and the absence of any epidemiological study on patients with BCC in Gonabad, the present cross-sectional study aimed at epidemiological evaluation of BCC in patients referring to the skin clinic of Allameh Bohlool Gonabadi Hospital.
Materials and Methods
The present retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on suspected BCC patients referred to the skin clinic of Allameh Bohlool Gonabadi Hospital from April 2015 to September 2018. The inclusion criteria entailed completed pathology reports and residing in Gonabad. The sample size was calculated at 120 cases based on the study by Balducci et al. [12] and considering a 95% confidence level. The data collection tool included a checklist containing subjects' demographic characteristics and the results of their pathology report, completed in Allameh Bohlool Gonabadi Hospital. After the approval of the study by the Vice-Chancellor for Research of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, sampling began via the census method. After obtaining the necessary permits to examine the pathology reports, the necessary arrangements were made with the officials of Allameh Bohlool Gonabadi Hospital and the laboratory. The researcher referred to the pathology laboratories of Gonabad and selected the research sample based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The samples were selected via the census method, and all the pathology reports suspected of BCC from the beginning of 2015 to the end of the first half of 2018 were included in the study. Thereafter, the data (age, gender, location of lesion, place of residence, and type of pathology) were extracted from pathology reports and recorded in the checklist. Data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 20) using descriptive tests (mean and standard deviation, percentage and frequency) and analytical tests (Fisher's exact and independent t-test). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
.png)
d=0,008 p=200105
Results
In this study, the data about 149 patients was analyzed. The prevalence of BCC in this study was obtained at 36.2%. Based on the results, the prevalence of this disease was higher in men (51.8%), and the highest was in 2017 (71.8%) (Table 1). In addition, based on Fisher's exact test, there was no statistically significant relationship between gender and the distribution of facial BCC.
As illustrated in Table 2, the prevalence of BCC was 36.2%, the highest rate was related to the face (77.8%), and the most common type of BCC was nodular.
Based on Table 3, there is a statistically significant relationship between the incidence of BCC and the mean age of the subjects, and BCC is more common in older participants.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants
Variable |
Variable levels |
Frequency (percent) |
Gender |
Female |
77 (51.7) |
Male |
72 (48.3) |
Place of residence |
City |
140 (93.9) |
Village |
9 (60) |
Year of referral |
2016 |
68 (45.6) |
2017 |
21 (14.1) |
2018 |
40 (26.8) |
2019 (the first half) |
20 (13.4) |
Type of variable |
Mean±SD |
Age |
Female |
55.17±66.73 |
Male |
60.20±11.12 |
No |
266 (66.5) |
![]() |
Table 2. Distribution of prevalence and location of basal cell carcinoma among participants
Variable |
Frequency (percent) |
Location of the lesion |
Face |
42 (77.8) |
Neck |
1 (1.9) |
Upper limb |
1 (1.9) |
Lower limb |
1 (1.9 |
Head |
6 (11.1) |
Ear |
3 (5.6) |
Type of basal cell carcinoma |
Invasive |
10 (18.51) |
Nodular |
42 (77.7) |
Others |
3 (5.55) |
Basal cell carcinoma development |
Yes |
54 (36.20) |
No |
95 (63.80) |
![]() |
Table 3. Relationship between demographic variables and basal cell carcinoma in patients
Variable |
Variable levels |
Frequency |
P- value |
Yes |
No |
Gender |
Male |
29 (40.3) |
43 (59.7) |
*P=0.34 |
Female |
25 (32.5) |
(67.5) 52 |
Place of residence |
City |
(35.7) 50 |
(64.3) 90 |
*P=0.72 |
Village |
(44.4) 4 |
(55.6) 5 |
Type of variable |
Mean±SD |
P- value |
Age |
Yes |
66.16±4.72 |
**P<0.001 |
No |
52.18±9.40 |
![]() |
Fisher's exact test **Independent t-test
Discussion
The present study aimed at the epidemiological evaluation of BCC in patients referring to the skin clinic of Allameh Bohlool Hospital in Gonabad. As suggested by the obtained results, out of 149 patients who underwent biopsy from 2016-2019, 54 (36.2%) cases were diagnosed with BCC. Other studies have yielded contradictory results regarding BCC cases. For instance, a study by Qasemzadeh reported that the prevalence of BCC in patients referred to Imam Khomeini Medical Center in Tehran was 56% [3]. In their study, Almasi-Hashiani et al. investigated the incidence of skin cancer in Markazi Province and reported that the prevalence rates of BCC, SCC, and malignant melanoma in Markazi Province were 74.7%, 20%, and 5.3%, respectively [13]. In a study by Darjani et al., the prevalence of this disease in Gilan province was reported to be 66% [9]. In a retrospective cohort study by Goldenberg et al., the prevalence of this disease was 53% in the United States [14].
In their study, Yazdanfar and Ghasemi assessed the rate of skin cancers in patients referred to Sinai Hospital in Hamadan and reported that the most common pathological type of skin cancer was BCC (59%) [15]. In another study conducted by Valavi et al., who evaluated the prevalence of skin cancer in the southwest of Iran, BCC was observed in 70.4% of patients [16]. According to a study by Afzali et al. in 2013, the incidence of skin cancer is increasing in Iran [17].
According to the studies reviewed, the prevalence of BCC was higher than that reported in the present research, which can be ascribed to residents' occupation, genetic factors, family history, participants' previous diseases, such as skin cancer or any other type of skin lesion, the geographical area, skin color, the use of sunscreen cream, and regular visit to a dermatologist for the examination of skin lesions. According to the results of studies, the annual incidence of melanoma in the world is reported to be 3%-7% [18].
Among the risk factors associated with skin cancer are immunodeficiency, AIDS, living in high altitudes, burns, chronic and unhealed wounds, tobacco abuse, and human papillomavirus [19]. BCC is the most prevalent skin cancer in white people in the world, and one of the leading causes of its development is long-term exposure to sunlight in exposed areas, namely the head. This cancer mainly occurs on the face [20]. According to the results of the current study, the prevalence of BCC was higher in men than in women; however, no statistically significant relationship was detected. The results of a study by Budhiraja et al. in India indicated a higher prevalence of BCC cancer in women [21]. This discrepancy in the results of these two studies can be attributed to the longer exposure of men to sunlight in Gonabad.
According to this study, the most affected site of BCC lesions is the face. In the study by Rezaei et al. in Kermanshah, face was the most common location of BCC lesions (87.7%) [22]. In a similar vein, the face was the most common site of involvement in the studies by Yazdanfar [15], Almasi-Hashiani [13], and Valavi et al. [16], reporting prevalence rates of 61.2%, 45.2%, and 66.5%, respectively. The results of the study by Budhiraja et al. in India indicated that the most prevalent site of BCC is the nose [21]. The majority of studies were in agreement with our research, probably due to contact with direct sunlight and UV rays.
Ultraviolet wavelengths of 320-400 nm cause sun tan and accelerate skin aging. Moreover, it causes erythema and DNA damage in the range of 280-320 nm [23]. The role of UV rays in carcinogenesis has been proven since 1992. The increase in cases of this cancer caused by UV rays is probably due to a combination of increased exposure to sunlight, increased outdoor activity, changes in the type of clothing, increased life expectancy, ozone layer depletion, genetics, and immunosuppression. The impact of ultraviolet rays on the skin can be classified into short-term effects, including tanning, vitamin D production, redness, and sunburn, and long-term effects, including lentigo, Actinic keratosis, BCC, SCC, melanoma, skin aging, and telangiectasias.
Intermittent but intense exposure to UV, which occurs in sunburns and tanning, causes BCC; nonetheless, continuous exposure (cumulative effect) increases the risk of SCC [24]. In our study, there was no significant relationship between facial BCC and gender. In line with the preset research, in the study by Memar et al. in Mashhad, there was no significant relationship between the prevalence of facial BCC and gender. This lack of association can be ascribed to women working in the outdoor environment and livestock farming without proper protection and sunscreen and, as a result, direct contact with sunlight and UV rays.
In accordance with the results of the present research, there was a significant relationship between the incidence of BCC and the mean age of subjects in the studies by Musah et al. in England [25], Almasi-Hashiani in Markazi province [13], Yazdanfar and Ghasemi in Hamadan [15], Valavi et al. in southwest of Iran [16], and Rezaei et al. in Kermanshah [22]. This finding can be due to the marked increase in the duration of exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet rays.
Furthermore, in the studies by Muzah in England [25], Almasi-Hashiani in Markazi Province [13], Yazdanfar and Ghasemi in Hamedan [15], and Valavai in the southwest of Iran [16], the mean age of patients with BCC was higher compared to that obtained in our study, which can be attributed to better care, genetic issues, people's occupation, their skin type, the geographical area where the subjects live, the high mean age of the entire population in the region, family history, and the history of previous diseases. In any case, the low mean age of subjects with BCC highlights the critical need to pay more attention to BCC and the periodic examinations of those at risk.
In our research, there was no significant relationship between the incidence of BCC and gender. Nevertheless, a significant relationship was found between the incidence of BCC and gender in the studies performed in Australia [26], England [25], and Iran in Markazi [13], Hamedan (prevalence of BCC in men was 65.1% in this study) [15], and Kermanshah provinces (out of 119 patients, 52.1% were men and 47.9% were women) [22]. This lack of association between gender and BCC can be ascribed to the employment of many women in agriculture, animal husbandry, and outdoor jobs and, as a result, long-term contact with sun and UV rays without protection.
In this study, there was no significant relationship between the incidence of BCC and the place of residence. However, the review of other studies, such as the research by Perera et al., demonstrated that BCC is more common in Australia than in Europe [26]. Moreover, locations near the equator and at higher altitudes have higher rates. In addition, Musah et al. conducted a systematic review study on all patients with BCC using data recorded in the UK health network from 2004 to 2010. They reported a significant relationship between the incidence of BCC and local area deprivation level, signifying that the prevalence of BCC is significantly higher among people residing in these areas [25].
In contrast to our research, these studies pointed to a significant relationship between the incidence of BCC and the place of residence, which can be due to working outdoors without protection from direct sunlight and UV radiation. In this study, the highest prevalence was related to nodular BCC (77.77%), and in both men and women, the highest frequency of BCC pertained to nodular lesions. The study by Rezaei et al. entitled "Clinical types and characteristics of basal cell carcinoma in Kermanshah province in 2009" demonstrated that the most common pathological type of BCC was nodular [22].
Conclusion
As evidenced by the results of this study, the prevalence of BCC is higher in men than in women. Moreover, it more frequently affects older adults, and the face is the most common site of involvement in both men and women. Considering the geographical location of Gonabad, where there is abundant sunshine on most days of the year, and residents' occupations, including agriculture, animal husbandry, and outdoor jobs under the sunlight, screening programs are recommended for the diagnosis of this disease in its early stages. It is worth noting that, unlike other studies, all suspicious and differential samples were tested for the possibility of BCC in this research.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
this research has been registered with the ethical code number (IR.GMU.REC.1398.089) at Gonabad University of Medical Sciences.
Funding
This article was extracted from the thesis submitted by Maryam Khakestani to the Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences.
Authors' contributions
Determining research objectives, research, analysis, and collection: Maryam Khakestani, Dr. Hamideh Mohammadzadeh; data analysis: Dr. Ali Alami; editing and finalizing the article: Maryam Khakestani, Dr. Hamida Mohammadzadeh, and Dr. Ali Alami; and final reading and approval: all authors.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the present study.
Acknowledgments
The authors' most profound appreciation goes to the Vice Chancellor for Research of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences and the officials of the Department of Pathology, Allameh Bohlool Hospital, who made it possible to conduct this research.
- Rezaei F, Saghafipour A, Mirheydari M, Eshagh Hosseini S. Trend of cancer incidence in qom province in a period of 8 years (2007-2014). Journal of Health. 2018; 8(5): 530-8. [Link]
- Fooladi S, Farsi H, Mohamadzadeh S. Detection and classification of skin cancer using deep learning. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2019; 26(1): 44-53. [DOI: 10.32592/JBirjandUnivMedSci.2019.26.1.105]
- Ghasemzadeh F, Etminani K, Arab-Kheradmand A, Hosseini Moini SB. A retrospective study on non melanoma skin cancer in Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Tehran, Iran. Journal of Dermatology and Cosmetic. 2017; 8(1): 9-21. [Link]
- Devine C, Srinivasan B, Sayan A, Ilankovan V. Epidemiology of basal cell carcinoma: a 10-year comparative study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 56(2): 101-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.11.018] [PMID]
- Leiter U, Keim U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of skin cancer: update 2019. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020; 1268: 123-39. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_6] [PMID]
- Venables Z, Nijsten T, Wong K-F, Autier P, Broggio J, Deas A, et al. Epidemiology of basal and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the UK 2013–15: a cohort study. Br J Dermatol. 2019; 181(3): 474-82. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17873] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Trakatelli M, Barkitzi K, Apap C, Majewski S, De Vries E, group E, et al. Skin cancer risk in outdoor workers: a European multicenter case–control study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016; 30 Suppl 3: 5-11. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13603] [PMID]
- Boniol M. Descriptive epidemiology of skin cancer incidence and mortality. Skin cancer prevention: CRC Press; 2016. p. 221-42. [Link]
- Darjani A, Alizadeh N, Gharaei Nejad K, Eftekhari H, Rafiei R, Shafaei Tonekaboni S, et al. Epidemiology and Trends of Skin Cancers in Guilan Province, Iran During 2010-2014. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2021; 29(4): 154-65. [DOI: 10.32598/JGUMS.29.4.1606.1]
- Mazloomymahmoodabad SS, Abedini R, Nayeb zadeh S, Nasimi M, Goddess M, nazari z. The Ecological Factors associated with Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Patients referring to the Tumor Clinic of Razi Skin Hospital, Tehran in 2017 (a case-control study). Tolooebehdasht. 2020; 19(3): 43-53. [DOI:10.18502/tbj.v19i3.4167]
- Ghaffar A, Reddy KS, Singhi M. Burden of non-communicable diseases in South Asia. Bmj. 2004; 328(7443): 807-10. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7443.807] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Balducci L, Aapro M. Epidemiology of cancer and aging. J Oncol Manag. 2005; 14(2): 47-50. [PMID]
- Mobarak-Abadi A, Rajabi R, Khani Y, Almasi-Hashiani A. Epidemiology of skin cancer in Markazi Province, Iran. Dermatology & Cosmetic. 2013; 4(3): 120-6. [Link]
- Goldenberg G, Karagiannis T, Palmer JB, Lotya J, O'Neill C, Kisa R, et al. Incidence and prevalence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and locally advanced BCC (LABCC) in a large commercially insured population in the United States: A retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Nov;75(5):957-966.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.06.020] [PMID]
- Yazdanfar A, Ghasemi E. Frequency of skin cancers in Hamedan from 1991 to 2007. Journal of Dermatology and Cosmetic. 2011; 2(2): 115-23. [Link]
- Valavi E, Rafie S, Pakseresht P, Siadat S. Prevalence of skin cancer in southwest of Iran. Koomesh. 2013; 15(1):83-8. [Link]
- Afzali M, Mirzaei M, Saadati H, Mazloomi-Mahmood-Abadi SS. Epidemiology of skin cancer and changes in its trends in Iran. Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. 2013; 17(5) :501-11. [Link]
- Belbasis L, Stefanaki I, Stratigos AJ, Evangelou E. Non-genetic risk factors for cutaneous melanoma and keratinocyte skin cancers:
an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J Dermatol Sci. 2016; 84(3): 330-9. [DOI 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.09.003] [PMID]
- Yaghoobi R, Rafiei R, Savad Dar F, Latifi S. Malignant Melanoma in Khouzestan: Study of 62 cases. Iranian Journal of Dermatology. 2002; 5(3): 7-14. [Link]
- Lv R, Sun Q. A network meta‐analysis of non‐melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatments: efficacy and safety assessment. J Cell Biochem. 2017; 118(11): 3686-95. [DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26015] [PMID]
- Budhiraja G, Bharti P, Singh H. Incidence of BCC in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Malwa region of Punjab. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2020;11(12). [DOI: 10.37506/ijphrd.v11i12.13226]
- Kavoussi H, Rezaei M, Isapour D, Doulabi SRSM. Clinical types and characteristics of basal cell carcinoma in Kermanshah province in 2009. Dermatology & Cosmetic. 2012;3(2):100-9. [Link]
- Behrooz M, Seif F, Asl J, Behrooz L. Variation of cosmic ultraviolet radiation measurements in Ahvaz at different months of year. Scientific Medical Journal (AJUMS). 2010; 9(1): 45-51. [Link]
- Mousavi F, Mohammad Vaseie M, MS RK-K. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Adults to the Protective Actions against Sun in Northwest Tehran, Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2011; 14(2): 126. [Link]
- Musah A, Gibson J, Leonardi‐Bee J, Cave M, Ander E, Bath‐Hextall F. Regional variations of basal cell carcinoma incidence in the UK using The Health Improvement Network database (2004–10). Br J Dermatol. 2013; 169(5): 1093-9. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12446] [PMID]
- Perera E, Gnaneswaran N, Staines C, Win AK, Sinclair R. Incidence and prevalence of non‐melanoma skin cancer in A ustralia: A systematic review. Australas J Dermatol. 2015;56(4):258-67. [DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12282] [PMID]